1. Valid Comparatives: “Quicker” Vs “More Quickly”
When it comes to comparing speed, the adverb “quickly” has two valid comparative forms: “quicker” and “more quickly.” Both variations are grammatically correct and convey the idea of a faster rate of motion or action. However, there are certain factors to consider before opting for one over the other.
2. Recommendation: Use “More Quickly” For Formality
To maintain a high level of formality in your writing and avoid being perceived as making an error or being too informal, it is generally recommended to use “more quickly” instead of “quicker.” While both options are acceptable, “more quickly” tends to align better with formal writing conventions. However, in certain contexts, the use of “quicker” can enhance the flow of the text, as discussed later in this article.
3. Popularity: “More Quickly” Overtakes “Quicker” Since The 1970s
Since the 1970s, there has been a noticeable shift in the usage of the comparative forms of “quickly.” Linguistic observations and data analysis indicate that “more quickly” has surged in popularity, surpassing the usage of “quicker.” This shift can be attributed to a variety of factors, including changes in language trends and evolving writing styles.
4. Comparative Forms: “More Quickly” And “Quicker” For “Quickly”
It is crucial to understand the relationship between adjectives and adverbs when exploring the comparative forms of “quickly.” While “quicker” is the comparative form of the adjective “quick,” “more quickly” serves as the comparative form of the adverb “quickly.” This distinction is vital in choosing the appropriate comparative form to accurately convey the intended meaning.
5. Usage Drop: “Quicker” Declines Compared To “More Quickly” In Books
Recent analysis of literary works shows a notable decline in the usage of “quicker” when compared to “more quickly.” This trend suggests that writers and authors are increasingly favoring the latter form when describing speed or rapidity. The shift in usage patterns may also be influenced by evolving language norms and an emphasis on precision in writing.
6. Misconception: “Quicker” As An Adverb Lacks Historical Support
Some sources claim that “quicker” became an adverb due to ease of pronunciation and a lack of understanding of grammar rules. However, historical usage data does not support this notion.
In fact, “quicker” has been used as an adverb for centuries and is firmly rooted in the English language’s historical context. It is essential to rely on accurate information and historical evidence when examining linguistic concepts.
7. Use “More Quickly” To Avoid Criticism
To maintain precision and adhere to formal writing conventions, it is advisable to use “more quickly” rather than “quicker.” Choosing “more quickly” over “quicker” will help you avoid criticism from grammar enthusiasts and language purists. However, it is important to acknowledge that in certain contexts, especially in creative or informal writing, the use of “quicker” can contribute to smoother and more natural text flow.
8. Acceptance: “Quicker” Is Fine For Improved Text Flow
While using “quicker” as a comparative form of “quickly” may not align with formal writing norms, it is considered acceptable when the goal is to enhance the flow and rhythm of the text. In these instances, the use of “quicker” can add a certain flair and informality that may better suit the context.
However, it is important to exercise discretion and carefully consider the impact on the overall tone and clarity of the writing.
In conclusion, both “quicker” and “more quickly” are valid comparative forms of the adverb “quickly.” However, “more quickly” is recommended for formal writing in order to maintain a high level of precision and avoid potential criticism. The popularity of “more quickly” has surpassed that of “quicker” since the 1970s, and this shift is reflected in literary works.
While some misconceptions exist regarding “quicker” as an adverb, historical evidence supports its usage. Ultimately, the choice between “more quickly” and “quicker” should consider the desired formality and clarity of the writing, with “quicker” being acceptable for improved text flow in specific contexts.
